By Jaques Fresco, November 16th 2012,
here.
HYPOCRISY OF SLAUGHTER: Israel's Orwellian account of Gaza campaign
Israel’s
assault on Gaza raises doubts that it has any interest in finding the
lasting peace settlement it proclaims to want. Does the campaign have an
alternative objective as part of a strategy to engineer a strike on
Iran?
It’s probably the world’s most tragic never-ending story.For almost
65 years now, Israel has been bombing, maiming and humiliating the
Palestinians, bulldozing their homes and placing Gaza in lock-down mode
turning it into the world’s largest concentration camp.
In the latest outbreak of violence this week both sides are accusing the other, “You started it!”Who knows? At this stage, does it really matter anymore who started the violence?
On Wednesday 14th, an Israeli helicopter attack killed Hamas military
wing leader Ahmed Jabari, triggering a violent reaction from Hamas
which rained little rockets over southern Israeli towns, which in turn
brought in more Israeli air attacks killing 19, injuring 100 and leaving
six children dead.
Dejá-vù: it’s January 2009’s “Operation Cast Lead” revisited; this time they’re dubbing it “Operation Pillar of Defense.”
Clearly, Israel’s right-wing leaders do not want a peaceful agreement
with the Palestinians. That’s why they’ve systematically sabotaged all
possibility of reaching a two-state solution.
The last honest Israeli who tried to bring peace was Prime Minister
Yitzhak Rabin, until he was gunned down in the streets of Tel-Aviv in
November 1995; not by an Islamic fanatic, not by some mad Neo-Nazi, but
by one Ygal Amir: an ultra-right-wing Zionist fanatic linked to both the
fundamentalist Settlers’ Movement and Israel’s security agency
Shin-Beth.
Since then, Israel’s extreme right-wing Apartheidists have called the
shots and will continue doing so even more now that Benjamin
Netanyahu’s Likud party has merged with Avigdor Lieberman’s Yisrael
Beitenu. Maybe this latest bout of Palestine-bashing is their way of
celebrating their new Gross Partei…
‘Don’t worry about America…’
Former Israeli PM Ariel Sharon is infamously quoted as yelling to his
colleagues during a heated debate in Israel’s Knesset in October 2001,
that they need not worry about American reaction to Israel’s
Palestine-bashing because “we the Jewish people control America!”
Watching how US politicians file through powerful Pro-Israel lobbies,
think tanks and organizations like AIPAC – American Israeli Public
Affairs Committee -, the ADL and others, competing to give their most
impassioned and dramatic pro-Israel speeches, one is tempted to believe
Mr. Sharon’s candid words.
During the recent US presidential campaign both Barack Obama and Mitt
Romney each tried to give their most convincing Joe Biden-like
“I-am-a-Zionist” speeches, to win over not just the Jewish vote and
money in America, but also the Zionist vote which is represented by many
non-Jewish born-again Christians.
So, when earlier this week US Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice openly
supported Israel and condemned Hamas’ retaliatory attacks describing
them as “violence that Hamas and other terrorist organizations are employing against the people of Israel“, one can hardly be surprised.
It doesn’t really matter who sits in the Oval office; whether
Democrat or Republican, the US will always unthinkingly and unreservedly
support Israel every time it decides to play a new round of
Palestine-bashing.
Naturally, US and global mainstream media willingly oblige, having
succeeded in drilling deep into the collective psyche the conclusion
that “Terrorism” is always linked to “Islamic Fundamentalists”.
So, Hamas is made illegitimate before we even start discussions about
a two-state solution. No matter that Hamas won the democratically held
2006 elections in Palestine; no matter that Israel itself was founded by
violent terrorist groups like Irgun Zvai Leumi, Stern and Hagganah
which later merged to become Israel’s – oh, so democratic! – Israeli
Defense Forces (IDF).
Those Zionist terror groups were led by Israeli founding fathers
later to become prime ministers (and even a Nobel Peace Prize Laureate!)
like Menahem Beguin and Isaac Shamir, who in their “freedom-fighter”
days blew up hotels with dozens of people inside them, assassinated UN
envoys, carried out hundreds of targeted assassinations, and imposed
policies of genocide by killing and maiming hundreds of thousands, and
then driving off millions of Palestinian men, women and children from
their homes and land using the most barbarous terror tactics.
Israel’s logic in Palestine seems to run like this: if Israel steals
lands and homes and livelihoods from the Palestinians, they have no
right whatsoever to complain; and if they dare fight back, then they
automatically become “terrorists”. America, the UK and most of the EU
seem to agree…
Good if I do it; bad if you do…
That’s why those countries have branded Hamas and Hezbollah “terrorist organizations”.
Basic political common sense, however, tells us that a nation’s armed
forces – whether in the US, Russia, China, Brazil or Israel – must
report to the civilian leaders of its Nation-State. But what happens if,
like the Palestinians, you are not allowed to have a Nation-State? How
can Palestinians defend themselves against Israel’s systematic terrorist
tactics if they can’t have their own Nation-State and therefore no
armed forces? That’s why Hamas and Hezbollah came into the picture to
offer the prospect of some self-defense.
Sure, it’s easy to disqualify them as “terrorist organizations” but –
using that same criteria – would the Western Powers today reclassify
the French Resistance during world war two, for example, as a “terror
organization”, simply because they refused to passively accept the
German military invasion of their country? Should the Resistance have
given up so as to avoid the Oberkommando in Berlin branding them as
“terrorists”?
And what about the terror groups that assassinated Libyan leader
Muammar Gaddafi last year or the ones wreaking havoc in Syria right
now?“Freedom fighters”, I presume, because they violently oppose non-US
friendly regimes?
The West must understand that you can’t have it both ways: either the
French Resistance, and Irgun and Stern, and Hamas and Hezbollah, the
Syrian and Libyan uprisings are all “freedom fighters” or, they should
all be branded “terrorist organizations”. You can’t have your cake and
eat it too.
All options on the table…
Going into full Baby-Bush-warmonger-mode, recently an IDF spokesman
threatened not just the Palestinians but the entire world saying that
for Israel, “all options are on the table…”
Powerful words coming from the only nation in the Middle East that
has an arsenal of nuclear weapons, and the behavioral track record that
gives credibility to their willingness to use them.
So, Palestinians must brace themselves for ever increasing levels of
violence in the days and weeks to come. Will this latest flare-up be
used by Israel as an excuse to attack southern Lebanon where Hezbollah
has its strong hold (and where Israel was routed when they last invaded
Lebanon for the nth time in mid-2006)?
Are we seeing a crescendo of violence leading to armed attack on
Syria in conjunction with Turkey/NATO and with the “Syrian Free Army”
(aka, Al-Qaeda, CIA, Mossad, MI6)?
Is this all part of an Israeli strategy to “Secure the Realm” that
has a unilateral military attack against Iran as Israel’s real and final
goal?
More generalized violence in the Middle East will help to convince
Obama (and the US military) to stop dragging their feet on Iran and to
come on strong again in the region.
Israel is calling this latest shock and awe attack “Operation Pillar
of Defense.” A Good Orwellian euphemism for Palestine-Bashing.
If Israel has decided to let all hell lose in the Middle East to set
the stage for an attack against Iran, then it becomes clear that the
violence should start (yet again!!) in martyred Palestine.
OK, so Israel starts a new Middle Eastern war in Palestine but… where does it end?